(by B.L.Mehta, Executive
President, Varun shipping Co. Ltd.)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
India is undoubtedly
emerging as a major LNG market of the future. For the generation of electric power LNG is
by far the most favoured fuel. LNG fueled Gas Turbine yields a high thermal efficiency of
55% as against 40% with Indian and 46% with imported coal. It has the highest calorific
value in comparison with all other competing fuels and is the most Eco-friendly. It gives
off the cleanest exhaust which is completely free from Acid Rain and other pollutants
(refer to Table I). Since LNG is free from contaminants like Sulphur, Sodium and Vanadium,
which generate corrosive after combustion products, operating costs, are comparatively one
the lowest.
India's installed power
generating capacity is of the order of 94,055 megawatts (nearly 10% of which is
contributed by Gas/Naphtha) and proposals for an additional capacity of 105,356 megawatts
are still alive on paper, being under various stages of approvals/implementation. (Refer
Table II). If these plans get implemented, approximately, 24% of this capacity would be
provided by Gas/Naphtha. However LNG is comparatively cheaper and enjoys better price
stability. Furthermore, LNG being available in abundant quantities in the Mid East
Countries, Malaysia, Indonesia and Western Australia, which involves fairly short shipping
distances, LNG would gain precedence over Naphtha in this niche. Some of the prominent
Power Generating Companies like TATA Electric Power Company is planning to even convert
their IPPs from coal to LNG. It is likely therefore that in the next decade LNG will play
a dominant role in the generation of electric power in India.
Additionally, LNG also
provides several base stocks for the production of Nitrogenous and Phosphate fertilizers
and petrochemical products in which India lacks self sufficiency and has to depend
exclusively on imports which are likely to continue in the foreseeable future. Examples of
these LNG derivatives are Ammonia, Methanol, MTBE, Formaldehyde and Methyl Methacrylate
and Acetic Acid (refer to Table III).
It is prognosticated on the
basis of above, that in a span of 5 to 10 years, Indian imports of LNG could touch 35 - 40
million Tons a year (refer Table IV). In terms of sea borne LNG trade India would then be
next only to Japan, which imports the largest and nearly two thirds of total LNG traded by
sea (65 million Tons/year). In order to cater to the sea transportation requirements of
LNG trade of this magnitude approximately 20 LNG vessels (about 130,000-cbm capacity)
would be needed. This will entail a time charter cost of over 700 million dollars per year
- which would undoubtedly impose a sizable burden on India's balance of payments.
In view of the above
perspective which has in the recent days acquired a high degree of visibility in the
international market, all kinds of multinational players interested in the cake that LNG
and related business opportunities in India present, are virtually swarming decision
makers involved in potential LNG related projects. Major players seen in this are: -
A
development of some concern that has surfaced recently in the Indian market, is the thrust
by the Suppliers, i.e. the LNG Marketing Corporations in the Source Countries (1) and the
Integrated Gas Companies (2), having substantial stake in the sale of LNG into India, to
sell Shipping Services in tie-up deals to Indian Companies intending to import LNG. The
sellers, even if they do not have any Shipping tonnage whatsoever (let alone LNG
Operational Credentials) e.g. Oman and some LNG Traders who too do not possess any
worthwhile LNG experience are vigorously pushing and enticing the buyers to relinquish the
Ownership and Management Control of LNG Shipping to them, which is contrary to the
practice followed by an overwhelming majority of LNG Importers. It is the same motivation
that pervades the marketing efforts of Japanese and Korean Corporations having
multi-billion dollars stake in selling ships and building LNG receiving/re-gassification
infra-structure in India. They are vigorously promoting tie ups for Shipping Services by
their group Companies i.e. NYK (A Mitsubishi Group Co), MOSK (A Mitsui Group Co.) and HMM
(A Hyundai Group Co.). Unsolicited suggestions for Joint Ventures are in the air in which
control of shipping should vest with the foreign partners.
In view of the fact, that
India has not enunciated a clear cut policy that should govern the transportation of LNG,
it is feared that we are unwittingly or by default, consenting to the domination of a
vital sector of our Industry by foreign Shipping interests, which will continue to cause a
huge drain in our foreign exchange resources for a long time to come due to the long term
nature of these contracts. Shipping contracts for LNG transportation entered into today
employing foreign ships, will oust the Indian Shipping from this Sector for all time to
come and this would sound the death knell of this industry which has been so painstakingly
nurtured over half a century. It is well known, that the growth of Indian Shipping Tonnage
is not only stagnating but has been declining in recent years due to a depressed freight
market. The LNG opportunity could provide it with the requisite shot in the arm that could
impart stability to our Shipping Industry through steady cash inflows available through
long-term charters. This is indeed an opportunity of a lifetime that cannot be frittered
away.
It is in this context that
a need for laying down a national policy for LNG Shipping with clear objectives that it
should serve, is inexorably warranted.
B. NATIONAL LNG
POLICY
Before delving into the
mechanics of formulating the LNG Transportation Policy it is worth considering whether the
LNG Transportation Policy should be a stand alone set of Objectives/Policy proclamations,
or be evolved as a sub set of an Integrated Public Policy dealing with all aspects of LNG
trade. Secondly, how and to what extent the Policy relating to the Ocean Transportation of
LNG should be integrated into the overall Public Policy. This should become clear after
giving a thought to some of the salient facets of the Public Policy that are likely to
impinge on the LNG trade in a country such as ours, having practical regard to the fact
that LNG trade always transcends across borders of several countries, serves several
Industrial goals in an Industrial Society and involves a vast number of players such as:-
the Gas sellers in the host country, gas buyers, investors/sponsors of associated
Industrial and infra-structural complexes, consumers/guarantors, transporters,
suppliers/vendors of capital equipment’s, insurers and risk managers each having
their own corporate goals and almost all belonging to different countries having different
financial, legal and tax regimes. It must, therefore be ensured that, at least, broad
objectives of the National Policy on LNG, that are consistent with overall national
interest, are identified and built into each of the subsets of the overall National
Policy. Some of the facets of Public Policy bearing relevance to the LNG trade are briefly
surveyed hereunder along with some directional suggestions/comments. A discussion among
the key decision making echelons in the inter related ministries, government departments
and trade organizations would provide the right forum and opportunity to evolve a balanced
National Policy.
C. JAPANESE EXAMPLE
The Japanese Government has
dealt with the LNG trade (Import and Transportation) in the following manner:-
(A summary of Japanese LNG
strategy is given in Annex. III)
It is pertinent to mention
that just as the situation in which Indian shipping stands today, the Japanese ship owners
had initially engaged foreign LNG operators who assisted them to phase in the know-how of
LNG operations. However, at the present juncture they have completely absorbed and
indigenised the operations of LNG vessels just as Indian Shipping Companies have mastered
the LPG operations. Further with the supportive policies laid down by the Japanese
Government the ownership control of LNG fleet has also been nationalized completely.
ADVANTAGES OF THE
JAPANESE MODEL (i.e. BUYERS CONTROL OF LNG TRANSPORTATION)
Control of Shipping by the
buyer enables diversification of supply sources and bestows a freedom from domination of a
single supplier. Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) sources their LNG supplies from as
many as six countries. It affords better control of price negotiations and reduces the
overall cost of supplies. It would be seen from the study of Annex. 1a and 1b that
approximately 120 Billion Cubic Meters of LNG (110 BCM for end 97 + 8% approx. annual
growth) are being currently traded by sea. Potential New Supplies of LNG, which are on the
shelf awaiting immediate commercialization of production for want of buyers are also
nearly of the same volume. This implies a 100% surplus ready for being tapped. Thus the
market is poised to move in favour of potential buyers for a foreseeable future. This
available freedom of choice can assist the buyer only if the control of shipping is
wielded by him.
Control of Shipping enables
the Buyer to affect cost reduction of his imports by availing of the swing volume margins
inherently incorporated in the Supply and Purchase Agreements (SPAs). The contracting
practices currently in vogue in LNG trade permit the buyer to fix the quantity of the
annual lifting with considerable flexibility of volumes between the Take or Pay Quantity
(MBQ) and the Maximum.
(Explanatory Notes)
E. LNG TRADE
PROSPECTS AND INDIAN SHIPPING
Even though, the National
Shipping Policy Committee constituted by the Government of India in 1997 headed by the
then Director General of Shipping: Shri M P Pinto had recommended that the emerging
potential of LNG shipping should be substantially reserved for Indian shipping companies,
it has unfortunately met with resistance from some quarters and the potential users. It is
not difficult to understand that the motivation for this resistance has been provided by
the vested interests represented by the Gas Sellers, Gas Traders and Equipment Vendors. By
and large the potential users of LNG shipping services in India seem to have been taken in
by false motivated propaganda prompted by foreign vested interests which has been nurtured
by inadequate awareness of the LNG shipping by the users, and public at large. An oft
repeated canard which has been vigorously spread is that Indian shipping companies lack
LNG expertise and their financial capabilities are insufficient to take on the burden of
massive investments that are necessary for the acquisition of LNG ships characterized by
huge capital costs. It must be said that the bulk of Indian Shipping Industry too has not
braced itself to this challenging opportunity in a pro-active manner. Neither has the
government provided a forum for an educated debate on the role that national shipping can
and should play in the LNG trade of the country. Consequently a gap does exist between
public perception and the ground realities in regard to the capabilities of Indian
Shipping Companies to service the trade.
Notwithstanding a general
public perception as evidenced from media reports, some of the Indian Shipping Companies
have, however, seriously investigated, ways and means of overcoming these purported
drawbacks and it has been found by them that the LNG vessels, are financed not necessarily
on the basis of direct asset mortgage or the strength of balance sheets of the intending
Companies, but that the financing of LNG vessels, is essentially driven by the project
cash flows. In view of the fact that the LNG vessels are from the inception, dedicated to
specific projects and are hence chartered for long tenures of about 20 years duration, the
assured revenues that flow from long term charter commitments provide an acceptable form
of security and comfort to the lenders. In fact funds are available in the international
market to finance acquisition of LNG vessels at a very low gearing. It is, also possible
to spread the loan repayments over longer tenures than the conventional shipping loans.
Some Indian shipping companies have already received assurances from the financial markets
in terms of firm commitments for the availability of financial packages for LNG Ships at
attractive terms.
As regards the alleged lack
of expertise in the Indian shipping companies to operate cryogenic vessels, at least three
Indian companies have reasonable working experience with LPG (-50° C) and Ethylene
(-104° C) vessels. Some of them have finalized working relationships and have signed
MOU's (Memorandum of Understanding) for a transfer of technology of LNG operations, in a
phased manner with operators of LNG Ships, having a good track record and internationally
established reputation.
It needs to be reiterated
that Indian shipping industry is not facing the challenge of embracing a new technology
for the first time. It is the contention of Indian Shipping Industry, that the technology
of LNG transportation is only marginally different (and not necessarily more difficult).
from LPG/Ethylene (refer to Annex. IV). It is pertinent to observe that major burden of
this difference (or complexity?) is absorbed by the design features of the vessel viz. by
Selection of appropriate materials for the Cargo Containment Systems to withstand the
lower cryogenic temperatures of -160° C for LNG and higher levels of insulation
standards, so as to obtain an acceptable rate of gas boil off. It is for this reason that
the cost of a LNG vessel of comparative capacity is approximately twice as much as that of
a LPG vessel. It is also noteworthy that construction and operation of LNG vessels is
rigidly regulated by the International Gas Carrier Code and the International Safety
Management Code (ISM) adopted by IMO which are universally binding. The Procedures and
Arrangement (P & A) Manuals which set down the Operational Procedures for Cargo
Handling Operations on board as required under the International Gas Carrier Code as well
as the ISM Documentation and Certification Procedures are mandatorily required to be
prepared by acknowledged experts and approved by Maritime Administration Authorities as
laid down by IMO. These procedures are uniformly applicable to all LPG and LNG Ships all
over the world. Thus the LNG operations on board ships of today enjoy a fair degree of
international standardization which the Indian Shipping Companies must also follow.
Similarly the qualifications and skills of shipboard staff serving on Gas Carriers of any
flag nationality have also been upgraded uniformly all over the world under the provisions
of Safety of Training, Certification and Watch Keeping (STCW 95) which has been adopted by
IMO on 01.07.1998 and is statutorily applicable for Indian Ships and Operators as well.
Therefore, it is envisaged
that the up-gradation of Operational competence from LPG/Ethylene to LNG by a Shipping
Company, would be achieved without much hassles provided however, the Indian companies
enter into workable Technology Transfer Agreements with international LNG operators. The
quality of such an arrangement and the basic ability pre-requisites of the Indian Company,
in any case, must be proven to the satisfaction of the International Lenders without whose
approval the raising of finances would never materialize. Thus the basic pre-requisites
for an Indian Shipping Company desirous of venturing into LNG Operations could be briefly
summarized as follows:-
F. SUGGESTIONS FOR
A NATIONAL POLICY FOR LNG TRANSPORTATION
The formulation of a
Comprehensive National Policy on LNG embracing all the inter related policy aspects
mentioned in Section B would need a lot of inputs from several ministries and government
departments and would consequently take some time. However, in the meantime salient
features of a National Policy for LNG Transportation logically derived from the preceding
discussion and based on the Japanese model which to a large extent, is also being followed
by South Korea and France (the other two major importers of LNG) are suggested for
consideration and implementation.
LNG be declared as a Strategic Commodity.
TABLE I
Comparative
Analysis: LNG Versus other Fuels
Plant Performance :
Gas versus Coal
PFBC : Pressurised
fluidised bed combustion; ICGC : Integrated coal gasification combined cycle; CCGT :
Combined cycle gas turbines.
Source : Power Line - May
1998
TABLE II - Indian
Potential
(Existing and proposed capacity)
Existing Capacity
(By ownership)
*Wind
Potential capacity
(Still alive on paper)
Source : Power Line
* June 1999
TABLE - III
LNG : Commercial
Uses
Derivatives of LNG are:
Fuel Applications of LNG:
TABLE IV
(Major LNG import
terminal proposals)
Source : Power Line
May 1998
ANNEXURE - 1a
(LNG IN ASIA -
DEMAND/SUPPLY)
Source
: Cedigaz, Paris
ANNEXURE – 1b
LNG IN ASIA - NEW
SUPPLY SOURCES
Source :
Cedigaz, Paris
ANNEX. - III
THE STRATEGY OF
JAPAN
Natural gas imports (all in
the form of LNG) are handled by well - established, credit worthy, large regional
utilities:
The Japanese government
encourages tariff stability and indirect support. No use of sovereign guarantees is
necessary. The support consists of:
Indonesia, (b) Malaysia,
(c) Alaska, (d) Qatar, (e) Abu Dhabi, (f) Brunei and (g) Australia.
Indonesia, (b) Malaysia,
(c) Brunei, (d) Australia, (e) Qatar and (f) Abu Dhabi.
(Source: Liquefied Natural
Gas: Developing International Energy Projects by Gerald B Greenwald)
ANNEXURE – IV
Technological
comparisons (LPG/LNG ships operation
|
Courtesy: http://shippingstarnet.com/lng.htm
Author:
Mr. Brij Lal Mehta is a Marine Engineer by profession and is well known figure in the Indian Shipping Industry. Starting his career in 1957 as a Junior Engineer, he rose to the position of Executive Director, Shipping Corporation of India. In 1981 he joined Century Shipping as Chief Executive and was responsible for making it a highly professional and profit making shipping company in a very short time. In 1991 he moved to Reliance Industries Ltd. as President, Shipping Division. He was responsible for setting up and operating Ethylene Supply System, comprising of shallow draft Liquefied Ethylene Carriers, a dedicated jetty terminal, safe navigation system, and Ship to Ship Ethylene Transportation System.Besides above he has represented various Technical and Professional bodies like, Chairman of Indian Technical Committee of Lloyd’s Register of Shipping and immediate past president of Indian National Shipowner's Association (INSA).At present he is Executive President with Varun Shipping Company Ltd., who owns a diversified fleet of 13 ships including LPG carriers, amounting to 50% of Indian LPG fleet.His present paper is a bench mark for Indian LNG policy and emanates from well-researched material, his administrative and technical knowledge, and long experience behind it. |
No comments:
Post a Comment